
Winter fun in Madison, Wisconsin.
Notes on photography, books, art, politics and other miscellany. Here is currently Madison, Wisconsin
I'm a long-time Amazon user and rely on it not just for books but for consumer products like electronics and photo equipment.Let Amazon know you expect them to keep their customers in mind while they fight with their suppliers.
I'm outraged by your delisting of Macmillan books. I don't care how you and your corporate partners wrangle among each other, but don't take it out on your customers. I'll be shopping elsewhere until I receive some assurance that this ridiculous negotiating strategy has ended -- AND WON'T BE REPEATED.
And meanwhile, I'll hold off on any e-reader purchase until after the iPad is available for purchase.
This asinine jockeying over electronic book prices has very little to do with what’s actually good or useful for anyone other than the manufacturer of a piece of hardware… who also happens to be a book retailer. I understand Amazon’s desire to corner the electronic book market with the Kindle, which requires publishers to bend to its will on pricing, but I’m not notably sympathetic to it. In one of those grand ironies of life, I’ve been here before with the iPod, a thing for which I buy music not from Apple but from Amazon, which sold DRM-free mp3s and earned my music purchasing dollars because of it (and who, if memory serves, allowed for some flexibility in pricing). Now my iPod touch is filled with music not bought from Apple. If these companies’ relative positions flip because of books, well, now. That would be funny.E-books are already rather insubstantial and distressingly virtual, especially the DRM versions like Amazon's that can't be passed on like a print book. This hardly seems a good time for Amazon to be be making sudden capricious moves that limit their customers' choices.

Apple may face a legal battle with Fujitsu of Japan and STMicroelectronics, Europe's largest chipmaker, over use of the iPad name for its tablet computer. STMicro trademarked the name for its proprietary semiconductor technology in 2000 in Europe and has been using the name since.The irony here, of course, is that Steve Jobs is a leading advocate of protecting intellectual property -- especially through Digital Rights Management technology. Doubtless he will prevail in any legal and financial wrangling about the iPad name. In doing so, he will underscore an important reality about intellectual property, especially in the areas covered by trademark and copyright law.
Fujitsu has made a handheld computer called the iPad for use by shop assistants since 2002, and has an outstanding trademark application for the name.
There are other owners of iPad trademarks, including Siemens, which has the right to use the term for engines and motors; and Coconut Grove Pads , which since 2008 has the right to the term for padded bras. The situation is reminiscent of 2007, when Apple first announced the iPhone and Cisco Systems owned the rights to the name. Cisco launched a lawsuit against Apple that was settled when the two companies agreed to share the name. Terms of the deal were never disclosed.

It’s bad economics, depressing demand when the economy is still suffering from mass unemployment. Jonathan Zasloff writes that Obama seems to have decided to fire Tim Geithner and replace him with “the rotting corpse of Andrew Mellon” (Mellon was Herbert Hoover’s Treasury Secretary, who according to Hoover told him to “liquidate the workers, liquidate the farmers, purge the rottenness”.)We did not go to the polls in 2008 to elect a dead Republican. Contact the White House and let them know what you think of this plan for political suicide.