iPad Sunset Mag Cover Spec from Jesse Rosten on Vimeo.
Just one more change the iPad seems likely to bring. A few years from now, we'll probably all wonder how people ever could have enjoyed magazines in which the visuals didn't move. Via PitaPixel.
Notes on photography, books, art, politics and other miscellany. Here is currently Madison, Wisconsin
iPad Sunset Mag Cover Spec from Jesse Rosten on Vimeo.
The difference between disinformation and just plain lying is in the scope of the enterprise: A lie is intended to conceal a specific truth (e.g. "I did not have sex with that woman"). Disinformation, on the other hand, is aimed at constructing an entire alternative reality -- one in which the truth can find no foothold because it conflicts just not with a specific falsehood, but with the entire fabric of the false reality that has been created. It puts the "big" in big lie, in other words.Billmon deconstructs the technique and points out that it's been pretty effective in muddying the media waters.
The idea is to string those phrases together in such a way as to verbally associate the Democrats with the very same conduct the Republicans are actually guilty of (i.e. incitement) without ever making the accusation directly.Straight out of the old Karl Rove playbook. It's crazy, all right -- but crazy like a Fox (double meaning intentional).
What makes this particular example so cunning are the specific words used. Liberals complain that conservative protestors have worn guns to teabagger rallies, or waved signs warning that if "Brown can’t stop this, a Browning can"? Well, now the Democrats also have been accused of using "weapons." Has the RNC stepped over the line by showing Nancy Pelosi burning in a sea of fire? Well, the Democrats are also "fanning the flames." Did the GOP House members encourage their followers to think of themselves as a revolutionary army by waving "Don’t Tread on Me" signs from the House balcony during the HCR vote? Well, the Democrats are also "ratcheting up the rhetoric."

So, while I'm disappointed, I'm also excited about the prospect for a great library on the current site. We believe we can do it at a lower cost and roughly on the same timeline. We will need to count on less private fundraising in a tight environment for philanthropy. And because we'll use the existing superstructure of the building, we are essentially recycling it. The greenest building is the one you rebuild.Yes. Glad he came around.
What we should not do is go back to square one. Looking for other sites would be way too time consuming, difficult and costly. I don't think that will be necessary because my initial discussions with alders have been very positive on the reconstruction. That's not surprising. After all, it was really the council that asked us to look at the reconstruction as a baseline to measure the other proposals against, and I know that many alders will be more comfortable with the lower costs.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -- Arthur C. ClarkeWhen I ducked into DC last fall for a quick visit to one of my favorite museums after completing some business in the suburbs, my GPS served me well. It led me right to the Phillips Collection, taking me through a back alley shortcut and delivering me right to an available parking space in front of the building. It was like magic (except for the parking space, which was just a lucky accident).
If these effects were not properly taken into account, a navigational fix based on the GPS constellation would be false after only 2 minutes, and errors in global positions would continue to accumulate at a rate of about 10 kilometers each day! The whole system would be utterly worthless for navigation in a very short time. This kind of accumulated error is akin to measuring my location while standing on my front porch in Columbus, Ohio one day, and then making the same measurement a week later and having my GPS receiver tell me that my porch and I are currently about 5000 meters in the air somewhere over Detroit.There's more. Check it out here. Although there's no magic involved, the account of how Einstein's insights proved to be absolutely vital to modern electronic navigation is fascinating.

No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed. Even if Republicans scored a 1994 style landslide in November, how many votes could we muster to re-open the “doughnut hole” and charge seniors more for prescription drugs? How many votes to re-allow insurers to rescind policies when they discover a pre-existing condition? How many votes to banish 25 year olds from their parents’ insurance coverage? And even if the votes were there – would President Obama sign such a repeal?There's another metaphor that applies. You could say the Republicans out-Foxed themselves. And seriously underestimated Barack Obama.
We followed the most radical voices in the party and the movement, and they led us to abject and irreversible defeat.

When I thought of all the years, all the battles, and all the memories of my long public life, I felt confident in these closing days that while I will not be there when it happens, you will be the president who at long last signs into law the health care reform that is the great unfinished business of our society. For me, this cause stretched across decades; it has been disappointed, but never finally defeated. It was the cause of my life. And in the past year, the prospect of victory sustained me – and the work of achieving it summoned my energy and determination . . .Tonight we watched more hours of C-SPAN at one sitting than we ever have in our lives. Despite all the flaws and compromises and imperfections in the bill, I was proud of what the Democrats, Speaker Pelosi and the President had accomplished. Politics is the art of the possible. If passing health care reform were easy in America, we would have had it years ago.
But you have also reminded all of us that it concerns more than material things; that what we face is above all a moral issue; that at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country.
And so because of your vision and resolve, I came to believe that soon, very soon, affordable health coverage will be available to all, in an America where the state of a family's health will never again depend on the amount of a family's wealth. And while I will not see the victory, I was able to look forward and know that we will – yes, we will – fulfill the promise of health care in America as a right and not a privilege . . .
Despite his illness, Senator Kennedy made a forceful appearance at the Democratic convention in Denver, exhorting his party to victory and declaring that the fight for universal health insurance had been “the cause of my life.’’And tomorrow when the first of the health care reform bills is signed into law, he will have kept the promise. It's far from perfect, but we'll be able to improve it.
He pursued that cause vigorously, and even as his health declined, he spent days reaching out to colleagues to win support for a sweeping overhaul; when members of Obama’s administration questioned the president’s decision to spend so much political capital on the seemingly intractable health care issue, Obama reportedly replied, “I promised Teddy.’’